Pristine Biosciences

Analytical CMC consulting · Potency & bioassay services

Build quality in from the start and reach the clinic with confidence.

Backed by more than 20 years of experience in biopharma, Pristine Biosciences provides phase-appropriate analytical strategy and hands-on bioassay expertise for biopharma programs moving from discovery and preclinical development through IND and Phase 1–2, from small molecules to advanced therapies.

Request a consultation Explore services

Discovery

Cell-based screening strategy

Preclinical

Methods, CQAs & potency design

IND

Specifications & CMC sections

Phase 1–2

Release, stability & oversight

Consulting services

Phase-appropriate analytical support, from strategy to execution

Our consulting is organized into six practice areas, each covering the full set of activities your program needs.

01

Release testing

  • Phase-appropriate release specifications

    Specifications for drug substance and drug product aligned with critical quality attributes, with performance assessed through data trending.

  • In-process testing

    Strategy for in-process controls and testing that monitor critical steps and support consistent product quality.

  • Lot release review

    Review of release data packages and certificates of analysis before lots are dispositioned.

02

Stability

  • Stability program design

    ICH-aligned programs for drug substance and drug product: storage conditions, time points and testing schedules.

  • Forced degradation studies

    Study planning and review that demonstrate your methods are stability-indicating.

  • Stability data & trend review

    Early detection of quality issues and evidence for shelf-life and retest-period proposals.

  • Cost-effective stability-indicating assays

    A phase-appropriate assay strategy, so you only invest what each stage actually needs.

03

Method development to validation strategy

  • Method readiness assessment

    Is each method fit for GMP release? Practical plans for early clinical use.

  • Method development, qualification & validation

    Design and oversight of studies, acceptance criteria and reports per ICH Q2(R2) and Q14.

  • Method transfer

    Protocols, acceptance criteria and report review for transfers to and from CDMOs and contract labs.

04

CDMO & contract lab selection and oversight

  • Vendor selection

    Scope definition and capability reviews to choose qualified analytical partners.

  • Method transfer oversight

    Independent oversight of transfers so methods perform at your partner as they did at the source.

  • Your QC representative

    Study plan and data review so vendors deliver reliable, inspection-ready results.

05

Deviations, OOS investigations & CAPA

  • Deviation investigations

    Structured investigations of laboratory and testing deviations.

  • OOS & OOT investigations

    Out-of-specification and out-of-trend results, from lab assessment to full investigation.

  • Root cause & impact assessment

    Science-based root cause analysis and product impact assessment.

  • CAPA

    Corrective and preventive actions that stop issues from coming back.

06

Potency, characterization & IND CMC

  • MoA-driven potency strategy

    A phase-appropriate potency assay matrix with a reference standard plan.

  • Characterization strategy

    Structure, function, variants and impurities, supporting CQAs and comparability.

  • IND CMC analytical sections

    Preparation and review of specifications, analytical procedures, method qualification, batch analyses and stability.

Reduce development costs. We help reduce development costs with a phase-appropriate strategy for method qualification, validation and stability-indicating assays, so you only invest what each stage actually needs.

Research & development

Cell-based screening assays

Senior guidance for hit-to-lead work, so your team advances the right hits with confidence, using discovery assays built to become your future potency methods.

  • Screening cascade strategy

    MoA-driven funnel with clear go/no-go criteria

  • Assay design & selection

    Right cell models, readouts and plate formats

  • Data-quality review

    Technical data review and good documentation practices

  • Hit triage & prioritization

    Objective, data-driven series recommendations

  • CRO selection & oversight

    Scope, study review and monitoring

  • Troubleshooting & rescue

    Fix noisy, drifting or failing assays fast

Laboratory services Coming next

Cell-based potency & activity assays

Mechanism-of-action-driven assays for research and clinical-stage programs, developed and qualified per ICH guidelines, from first feasibility to transfer-ready methods.

  • MoA-driven potency strategy
  • Assay development and qualification
  • Stability-indicating potency through forced degradation studies

Cell-based potency and activity assays (non-GMP)

qPCR and PCR-based assays, plus more plate and cell-based assays

Flow cytometry-based assay solutions

In practice

Typical challenges we help solve

Representative scenarios, not client case studies.

Pre-IND

No potency assay ready for release

Define an MoA-based potency strategy, a qualified interim assay and a reference standard plan in time for the IND.

Phase 1

Release results drifting at the contract lab

Trend the data, lead the investigation with the vendor, and put method and specification fixes in place.

Phase 1–2

Shelf-life claim needs support

Design an ICH-aligned stability program and forced degradation studies that prove methods are stability-indicating.

Our expertise

20+

years of combined experience across academic research and the pharmaceutical and biotech industry

Niraj Bhatt, PhD

Niraj Bhatt, PhD

Founder & Principal Consultant · 20+ years in biopharma: PhD in biochemistry, six years of postdoctoral research, and 10+ years of pharma and biotech QC leadership

Read full profile

Phase-appropriate

What regulators expect at each stage, without unnecessary spend.

Independent

Objective oversight of your CDMOs and contract labs.

Quality-minded

Documentation and statistics built to stand up to FDA review.

Flexible engagement

Readiness assessments, defined projects or a fractional QC lead.

Meet the founder

Portrait of Niraj Bhatt, PhD, founder of Pristine Biosciences

Niraj Bhatt, PhD

Founder & Principal Consultant, Pristine Biosciences

Areas of expertise

  • Release, in-process and stability testing strategy
  • Method development, qualification, validation and transfer
  • Cell-based potency assays and bioassay strategy
  • CDMO and contract laboratory selection and oversight
  • Deviations, OOS investigations and CAPA
  • IND CMC analytical sections
  • Cell-based screening strategy for hit-to-lead R&D
  • Cell and gene therapy, biologics, biosimilars and ADCs

About

Dr. Niraj Bhatt is the Founder and Principal Consultant of Pristine Biosciences, which he established to give emerging biopharma companies direct access to phase-appropriate analytical and quality expertise. With more than 20 years of biopharma experience spanning drug discovery, contract research and quality control for cell therapy manufacturing, Dr. Bhatt helps clients move programs from preclinical development through IND and Phase 1–2 with confidence.

His consulting focuses on release and stability testing, method development through validation, potency and bioassay strategy, deviations and CAPA, IND CMC documentation, and the selection and oversight of CDMOs and contract laboratories. Having worked on both the sponsor and CRO sides of the industry, he brings a practical, cost-conscious approach that balances regulatory expectations with each program’s stage and budget.

Professional experience

  1. CRISPR Therapeutics

    At CRISPR Therapeutics, Dr. Bhatt built and led Quality Control for gene-edited CAR-T cell therapy manufacturing, gaining hands-on experience with the challenges clients face on the path from IND to the clinic. He developed the QC readiness strategy for in-process, release and stability testing that supported 12 GMP batches in a single year, led nine method transfer and qualification activities, and oversaw contract testing laboratory partners. He owned deviations, investigations and change controls, authored IND CMC sections, and implemented LIMS for sample management. He also delivered approximately $2 million in savings through risk-based, phase-appropriate redesigns of qualification and stability programs.

  2. Charles River Laboratories

    As a Study Director at Charles River Laboratories, a leading global CRO, Dr. Bhatt led GLP cell-based bioassay studies, including cytokine release and ELISpot assays, for cell therapy products such as CAR-T cells and CD34⁺ stem cells. He designed, drafted and reviewed analytical methods, gaining direct insight into how contract laboratories plan, execute and report studies for sponsors.

  3. PPD (now part of Thermo Fisher Scientific)

    At PPD, another leading global CRO, Dr. Bhatt served as a Technical Project Manager and primary client contact, managing multiple cGMP potency assay programs for biosimilars and antibody-drug conjugates using cell-based potency assays. He led method qualification and optimization to ICH and USP standards and authored investigations, deviations, trend analyses, CAPAs and change controls, while consistently meeting turnaround targets. This CRO-side experience informs how he now selects and oversees contract laboratories for clients.

  4. Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company

    Dr. Bhatt began his career in drug discovery at Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company, part of one of India’s leading pharmaceutical companies. There he designed efficacy screens for new chemical entities and established 13 disease-relevant animal models to characterize efficacy, safety, toxicity and PK/PD relationships. His hit-to-lead work contributed to an IND for a molecule that advanced to Phase II clinical trials.

Research background

Dr. Bhatt completed six years of postdoctoral research at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the University of Maryland, Baltimore, where he developed new cell-based models and assays.

Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University

His first postdoctoral project focused on restoring heart function in diabetes. He showed that oxidative stress disrupts the redox balance of heart muscle and reduces its contractility, and that restoring redox balance improves cardiac function.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University

His second postdoctoral project focused on patient-derived stem cells for a rare disease. He established the lab’s first induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) program, developing an integration-free method to reprogram patients’ blood cells into iPSCs as a disease model for Ataxia-Telangiectasia.

University of Maryland, Baltimore

He studied energy production in brain cells, investigating mitochondrial bioenergetics and drug mechanism of action in astrocytes and microglia under physiological oxygen and proinflammatory conditions. His work addressed whether shifting the metabolism of microglial cells could reduce inflammation in the brain. He also established siRNA and immunohistochemistry methods in the lab.

Contact

Ready to accelerate your program?

Tell us about your molecule and stage, and we’ll set up a 30-minute consultation.

[[email protected]]

[Phone number]

Greater Boston, Massachusetts

Stay current on analytical CMC

Occasional notes on potency, stability and regulatory expectations.